Skip to content

Deployment Choices

L2Proxy supports both identity-aware enforcement inside authenticated virtual access and standalone services for industrial boundaries, passive observation, and offline analysis. Different modes can operate together at the same site.

Selection guide

Mode Traffic impact Primary purpose Typical adoption stage
L2Proxy Connect Active User- and session-aware industrial enforcement inside the protected virtual access environment Production remote access
Passive observation None Visibility, baselining, and policy tuning Discovery and commissioning
Offline validation None Investigation, regression, and acceptance testing Engineering and test
Transparent inline protection Active Enforcement without changing the existing addressing plan Controlled rollout
Routed inline protection Active Enforcement at an established industrial zone boundary Production operation

Raymon deployment topologies for standalone L2Proxy, L2Proxy Connect, and hybrid placement

Figure — Deployment topologies and product placement for Standalone L2Proxy and L2Proxy Connect.

Passive first

For an existing plant, begin with representative bidirectional traffic. Establish normal masters, outstations, PLCs, functions, maintenance windows, retry behavior, and expected startup sequences. Run enforcement candidates as log rules before converting a result to Block.

L2Proxy Connect

Connect receives the industrial frame and authenticated session identity directly in the internal forwarding path. It does not require a separate bridge, routed inspection detour, or packet queue for that traffic. Use it when policies must distinguish users and sessions as well as equipment and operations.

See L2Proxy Connect for the complete identity-aware workflow.

Inline readiness checklist

  • Both directions of the industrial exchange are available to the protection service.
  • Normal startup, recovery, failover, maintenance, and emergency procedures were captured.
  • Policies were tested with representative recorded traffic.
  • Missing state, timeout, replay, duplicates, and out-of-order events have explicit behavior.
  • The customer approved the safe response when inspection cannot make a normal decision.
  • Service and event-storage capacity have been sized for the protected path.
  • A rollback and bypass procedure exists for the change window.

Operational ownership

Rule changes affect process communication and should follow the customer's management of change. Recommended reviewers include control engineering, OT operations, network engineering, and OT cybersecurity. A rule should identify its owner, affected assets, deployment mode, enforcement status, test evidence, and rollback condition.

See Service Profiles for standalone profile management and Policy Assignment and Activation for the handoff from approved policy to a running service.